<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for epalla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epalla.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epalla.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 06:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fuck you Javascript by James</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2009/06/fuck-you-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=158#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>I know, Fuck Javascript.
I spent at least an hour implementing an animation because it wasn&#039;t working for no reason.
Still don&#039;t know why it wasn&#039;t working...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, Fuck Javascript.<br />
I spent at least an hour implementing an animation because it wasn&#8217;t working for no reason.<br />
Still don&#8217;t know why it wasn&#8217;t working&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on jQuery Validation with multiple (mostly) identical forms by Satan</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2009/12/jquery-validation-with-multiple-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator>Satan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=453#comment-2676</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what I was looking for, didn&#039;t notice the difference between this and $(this)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what I was looking for, didn&#8217;t notice the difference between this and $(this)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wow it&#8217;s been a long time. by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2010/02/wow-its-been-a-long-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=483#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wow it&#8217;s been a long time. by 92.625</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2010/02/wow-its-been-a-long-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2409</link>
		<dc:creator>92.625</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=483#comment-2409</guid>
		<description>sean, all i think your&#039;s is good for is hanging clothes on.

matt, my ankle still hurts to this day.  take care of your shit.

sean, lets go skiing over my spring break.

matt, lets go skiing over my spring break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sean, all i think your&#8217;s is good for is hanging clothes on.</p>
<p>matt, my ankle still hurts to this day.  take care of your shit.</p>
<p>sean, lets go skiing over my spring break.</p>
<p>matt, lets go skiing over my spring break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wow it&#8217;s been a long time. by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2010/02/wow-its-been-a-long-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=483#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>Nope.  That all came to a screeching halt when I messed up my ankle in January.  Almost better now though - I need to get some snowboarding in soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  That all came to a screeching halt when I messed up my ankle in January.  Almost better now though &#8211; I need to get some snowboarding in soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wow it&#8217;s been a long time. by seanpr123</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2010/02/wow-its-been-a-long-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>seanpr123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=483#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>...

Still hitting the stationary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Still hitting the stationary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I like this song way too much by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2010/01/i-like-this-song-way-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=475#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>For some reason the idea of Drew rocking out to this song puts a great big grin on my face :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason the idea of Drew rocking out to this song puts a great big grin on my face <img src='http://www.epalla.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I like this song way too much by Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2010/01/i-like-this-song-way-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=475#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>LOL!  I have been guilty of listening to this song as well.  Very catchy in an odd way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  I have been guilty of listening to this song as well.  Very catchy in an odd way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I started watching Matrix Reloaded&#8230; by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2010/01/i-started-watching-matrix-reloaded/comment-page-1/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=467#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>About every 5 years or so I need a reminder of how amazing the Mighty Ducks is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About every 5 years or so I need a reminder of how amazing the Mighty Ducks is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avatar (2009) and 3D-O-Vision by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.epalla.com/2009/12/avatar-2009-and-3d-o-vision/comment-page-1/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epalla.com/?p=461#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>So I saw this one opening night, also in 3D, and have been waiting for you to post a review so could throw in my own little addendum.

As far as the plot goes, I don&#039;t think they ever really tweaked anything.  To be honest, what we have here is almost 100%, point-for-point, Pocahontas in space.  The humans (Europeans) come to an alien world (America) looking for some extremely valuable mineral (gold).  One of the humans gets tangled up with the locals (Native Americans), starts hanging around the chief&#039;s daughter (Pocahontas), who is more or less betrothed to the village&#039;s top warriors (Kokoum, not gonna look up the spelling, and I&#039;m surprised I even remember his name).  This human decides he likes the girl/locals more than his own people, switches sides, and fights them off in the big climactic battle.  It&#039;s all there.  Honestly, though, it didn&#039;t bother me at all, especially because they completely downplayed the whole betrothed thing.  I think there were about 2-3 lines of dialogue that actually dealt with it.  Since it really wasn&#039;t an especially important part of an already lengthy movie (the tension between our human and the natives is already plenty high from other areas), I was happy to see that it wasn&#039;t given much screen time.

I want to say, what you said about the 3D was true, but I question how valuable the technology as it exists today really is.  What was added to the movie was decent, but given the strain that the glasses put on my eyes (they were watering about an hour and a half in and I had to take them off for a second) I question how much it was really worth using.  I almost feel like the gimmickiness of the popping out is what the whole thing is meant to do, so until we get a better way to make things 3D, I just assume see it without.

Everything else you said I completely agree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I saw this one opening night, also in 3D, and have been waiting for you to post a review so could throw in my own little addendum.</p>
<p>As far as the plot goes, I don&#8217;t think they ever really tweaked anything.  To be honest, what we have here is almost 100%, point-for-point, Pocahontas in space.  The humans (Europeans) come to an alien world (America) looking for some extremely valuable mineral (gold).  One of the humans gets tangled up with the locals (Native Americans), starts hanging around the chief&#8217;s daughter (Pocahontas), who is more or less betrothed to the village&#8217;s top warriors (Kokoum, not gonna look up the spelling, and I&#8217;m surprised I even remember his name).  This human decides he likes the girl/locals more than his own people, switches sides, and fights them off in the big climactic battle.  It&#8217;s all there.  Honestly, though, it didn&#8217;t bother me at all, especially because they completely downplayed the whole betrothed thing.  I think there were about 2-3 lines of dialogue that actually dealt with it.  Since it really wasn&#8217;t an especially important part of an already lengthy movie (the tension between our human and the natives is already plenty high from other areas), I was happy to see that it wasn&#8217;t given much screen time.</p>
<p>I want to say, what you said about the 3D was true, but I question how valuable the technology as it exists today really is.  What was added to the movie was decent, but given the strain that the glasses put on my eyes (they were watering about an hour and a half in and I had to take them off for a second) I question how much it was really worth using.  I almost feel like the gimmickiness of the popping out is what the whole thing is meant to do, so until we get a better way to make things 3D, I just assume see it without.</p>
<p>Everything else you said I completely agree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
